Howard Dean really put his foot in his mouth with his Confederate flag remark. Not surprisingly, he's already retreating from it.
Edward Sebesta has a Web site called Temple of Democracy where he discusses issues relating to the "neo-Confederate" and other far-right extremist groups. This comment of his caught my eye in particular:
It is not a new observation that the racial division between white
and black working people in the former Confederate states has worked against
them and enabled various elites to dominate both of them. Hinton Helper realized
that the plantation system oppressed white non-elites before the Civil War. One
of the fears of the plantation class before the Civil War was that blacks and
whites would work together.
I was glad to see the reference to Hinton Helper, an antislavery Southerner who published a book in 1857 (the year of the infamous Dred Scott decision) called The Impending Crisis of the South. His book goes into a great deal of detail comparing the Northern and Southern economies, relying heavily on contemporary economic statistics. He argues that the Northern industrial/commercial economy was far more efficient and prosperous, and refutes some of the most prominent arguments of pro-slavery propagandists.
He also emphasizes how slavery damaged the interests of non-slaveholding whites in the South. In a weird sort of way, Helper's argument is made even stronger by the fact that the guy was a white supremacist. That comes out at places in the book. After the Civil War, he published books advocating the explusion of African-Americans from the United States (which we would call "ethnic cleansing" today).
Helper was no saintly prophet of multiculturalism, in other words. But he was dead-on in his analysis of slavery. And The Impending Crisis of the South still makes fascinating reading to get an idea of the terms in which slavery was debated by contemporaries prior to the Civil War.
No comments:
Post a Comment