I wind up quoting Salon quite a bit on the subject of the Christian Right and the politics of religion. And that's because they're one publication that often publishes critical looks at that powerful faction of the Republican Party.
Camon writes that "as we brace for more battles over abortion rights, gay marriage, stem cell research and so forth," that it's time for Democrats and liberals - and maybe even mainstream journalists? - to "ask just how Christian the supposedly pious Bush administration really is. Because what happened in New Orleans, and what has been happening in Iraq, raises serious questions about whether Bush & Co. deserve to be called Christian at all. "
And he goes on:
Natural disasters are often labeled "acts of God." Those who take the expression literally may think that God is punishing our sins (a belief shared by some Christians with those Muslims who think Katrina is Allah's reprisal), or they may struggle to reconcile the idea of an infinitely good God with the devastation he brings upon us. But you don't have to take the expression literally to feel that natural disasters call into question the meaning of life. They cut us down to size, and challenge us to rise up again. They make us mourn for the dead and reach out for the survivors. If we do believe in God, even just a little bit, they are a true test of our faith, and an opportunity to do what we preach: to give, to comfort, to assist.
Wars are acts of man, yet all too often are fought for a "holy" cause, painted as deeds of "infinite justice" or "crusades" of good vs. evil. But it's when we look at the victims that faith is truly tested. A religious person will have the chance to show all his horror, regret, compassion, forgiveness. In war, many parents will lose their children, a sacrifice so profound that it is more than a human being can be expected to bear; a sacrifice that is, in fact, made by God - the Christian one - and proof of godliness. (In one of the harshest and most controversial biblical tales, Abraham is ready to sacrifice his son before God, as he believes God asked him to do, but God stops him before he goes through with it. However one wants to interpret the tale - whether it's about obedience or misunderstanding - the point is, God doesn't actually want to impose on a parent the loss of a child.) To those who suffer such a loss, we have a chance - and an obligation - to offer utmost solidarity.
I don't think the Democrats need to be shy about taking these people head on. It's interesting to me that a number of the Republicans commenters we get here at The Blue Voice are careful to distance themselves from the religiosity that defines their party today. But what do they think their party is really about then?
No comments:
Post a Comment