Long-time students of terrorism are quite familiar with fluctuating public attitudes toward the subject. Before 9/11 we were seen as eccentrics, rambling on obsessively about a supposedly non-existent threat. Afterwards, we were seen as Cassandras, with our worries suddenly taken very seriously indeed. Despite the shift in popular attitudes, however, the professionals' views didn't change all that much. Before, they thought the probability of a major attack was real but relatively low, and they think the same thing now.Tags: global war on terror, jessica stern, terrorism, war on terror
The one area where all the Roundtable participants [a Foreign Affairs roundtable on terrorism] seem to agree is that terrorists aim to make us react in ways that threaten our security, in essence doing their work for them. This is sometimes referred to as an "auto-immune response" to terrorism: They attack us, we attack ourselves in response. The jihadists behind 9/11 set out to provoke us into taking actions that would reduce our security, prestige, and moral authority, and measured against that objective, they did pretty well. One can point this out, however, without making light of the continuing threats that the jihadists pose. (my emphasis)
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Overreacting and reacting foolishly to jihadist terrorism
Jessica Stern, an actual expert on terrorism, wrote back on 09/11/06 (The Song Remains the Same Foreign Affairs Web site):
Labels:
global war on terror,
jessica stern,
terrorism,
war on terror
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment