Showing posts with label ezekiel bittery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ezekiel bittery. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 27, 2017

Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III on college free speech - and the President's?

The Kebler Elf's evil twin, Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, spoke at Georgetown yesterday. He was introduced by a guy named Barnett. You can't make this stuff up. Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks on campus free speech at Georgetown Law PBS Newshour 09/26/2017:



For those of you blessed enough not to recognize the Barnett reference, he was the most notorious governor Mississippi ever had. And that's saying at lot! This 1959 campaign song of his gives a flavor, Roll With Ross:



Yes, you may wonder why "he's his own boss" would be considered a desirable qualification for an elected public servant. One of the many eldritch mysteries of Segregation 1.0.

JBS III was talking about free speech on college campuses. Two things to understand about this. One is that JBS III is a straight-up segregationist. He could have stepped into a time warp at the 1948 Dixiecrat convention and emerged this past Sunday, just in time to be briefed on the latest white supremacist phraseology.

When I was in college in Mississippi, I heard Ross Barnett speak to a small group of student in a classroom. This was 1974, as I recall, well after defending de jure segregation was consider pointless (for the time being). Rolling Ross came off just like he sounded when inciting a treasonous uprising at Ole Miss in 1963. A blithering bigot, in other words. I remember thinking at the time that it was a momentary dose of something preserved from 10 years ago. Which seemed then a much longer time than it does now.

Watching JBS III is a similar kind of thing. Although he's part of a full-blown segregation-restorationist movement that currently controls the White House. Their predecessors of the 1870s liked to call themselves Redeemers.

The other thing is that this speech is an example of what Alex Pareene in another context has cleverly is called a “the greatest threat to free speech in the nation today is college students heckling an asshole” presentation. (You Are Jonathan Chait's Enemy Splinter 09/26/2017) This is also part of a long-standing authoritarian-conservative obsession, the idea that colleges are dominated by Jew-Commie-Mean Libruls who look down their noses at Real Americans.

Sinclair Lewis created a minor character that embodied this attitude, the Rev. Ezekiel Bittery, in the 1943 novel Gideon Planish. The Rev. Bittery had been discovered by some leftie newspaper who reported he was preaching hellfire sermons about the virtues of Jesus and fascism. After a while, a regional newspaper picked up the story. Finally, it made its way to a major metropolitan daily. Eventually Congress and others make formal investigations, and there is considerable hand-wringing about this exotic development in the heartland:

And during all this time, the Reverend Ezekiel himself will, as publicly as possible, to as many persons as he can persuade to attend his meetings, have admitted, insisted, bellowed, that he has always been a Ku Kluxer and a Fascist, that he has always hated Jews, colleges and good manners, and that the only thing he has ever disliked about Hitler is that he once tried to paint barns instead of leaving the barns the way God made them.
JBS III's speech was stock whining about the Mean Libruls being mean to nice Christian white folks, based on generalizing from marginal cases for the most part. There are a number of Christian Right legal groups who present themselves as civil rights advocates but actually are more interested in trying to get courts to ratify a theocratic political agenda. The American Center for Law and Justice, Liberty Counsel and the Alliance Defending Freedom are some of the better known of these groups. See: Daniel Bennett, The Rise of Christian Conservative Legal Organizations Religion & Politics 06/10/2015. Bennett also reports on a current case being pursued by the latter group, Masterpiece Cakeshop: Meet the Christian Legal Group Behind the High-Profile Court Case Religion & Politics 07/19/2017.

JBS III was vague on Tuesday about just what cases he was referring to. But they sound like the sort of thing such conservative groups pursue. They sometimes have good grounds to pursue them, and more legitimate civil liberties groups like the ACLU are sometimes on the same side. But often they are fairly marginal cases, like overzealous school administrators not allowing Christmas carols to be sung in school assemblies. And the AG made it clear that the Justice Department was prioritizing Christian nationalist sort of cases going forward.

JBS III's case might sound convincing if you don't know anything about what happens on college campuses and don't want to know. One "tell" was that he even mocked UC-Berkeley for bending over backwards just this month to allow a couple of obnoxious white nationalists to speak on campus. And somehow even this is a sign of how Berkeley is run by Mean Liburuls who hate free speech. Emily Deruy reports on some of this week's events there in Milo Yiannopoulos’ 15 minutes in Berkeley cost university $800,000 East Bay Times 09/24/2017. To those not washed in the blood of white nationalism, this looks like a university being very serious about protecting free speech, even though everyone involved knows that the rightwing provocateurs holding the event were hoping for disruptions that would give them more excuse for their WATB stock whining about Mean Libruls pickin' on them.

JBS III of course tossed in a lot of standard general quotes about why freedom of speech is a good thing, so there's that.

Another real "tell" came in the brief questioning period afterward, when the AG is asked about the President's tirade against black football players over "taking the knee" during the playing of the National Anthem at football games. JBS III responded, "The President has free speech rights, too."

This is a mirror-image redefining of free speech not as protection of free speech against existing authorities into the defense of declarations for the highest governmental executive authority. This is rightwing victimization taken to an insane extreme. Of all people in the country, the President is the least in danger of having his free speech restricted. As he illustrates daily in his tweets and speeches.

Thursday, January 17, 2013

The NRA and finding Rev. Ezekiel Bittery

Way back in 2005, when it was the Republican President George W. Bush pushing to cut benefits on Social Security and not a Democratic President, I recalled a story from one of Sinclair Lewis' less well known novels, Gideon Planish (1943), about the Rev. Ezekiel Bittery.

I was reminded of it this week, seeing people express surprise at the blithering fanaticism being articulated so proudly and publicly by the National Rifle Association (NRA). Joan Walsh, for instance, asks in Salon, Has the NRA lost it entirely? 01/16/2013 (or at least the headline-writer asks it). She explains what she means:

On the eve of President Obama announcing his gun control agenda, based on Vice President Joe Biden's task force recommendations, the National Rifle Association needed to go big: to remind Americans that the organization protects their gun rights, and to remind politicians that they’re a smart and formidable political force they’d be unwise to cross.

Instead, they showed us the truth: They're part of the vast and increasingly incompetent right-wing conspiracy that's sacrificed its own effectiveness for the pleasure of hating Democrats generally and our first black president in particular.
But, as Steven Rosenfeld explains in The Suprising Unknown History of the NRA Alternet 01/13/2013, the NRA went off the political deep end in 1977. And they've stayed there ever since.

Which brings me to the Rev. Bittery. Plagiarizing freely from my 2005 post here, Sinclair Lewis use the good Reverend to illustrate "Research", which he calls "[o]ne of the most important activities of any liberal educational organization." The example, set in the late 1930s, is the Rev. Ezekiel Bittery. Apparently he had some problems with his formal credentials, because the narrator refers to him as the "ex-Reverend."

The first step in Research is to gather a bunch of stories from newspapers about Brother Bittery and then write him to get some of his pamphlets. Then you have a few people go listen to his speeches live. With this procedure, it becomes well established that:

... Brother Bittery is a flannel-mouthed rabble-rouser who used to be charged not only with stealing the contents of the church poor-box, but of taking the box itself home to keep radishes in, and who at present if he isn't on the pay-roll of all the Fascists, is a bad collector.
After considering the matter for a couple of years, a Congressional committee proceeds to investigation, establishing for the record that "Mr. Bittery used to be a hell-fire preacher and is now a hell-fire Fascist."

More Research ensues, with scholars applying themselves to the phenomenon, which reveals "that Mr. Bittery used to favor lynching agnostics and now favors lynching socialists."

And during all this time, the Reverend Ezekiel himself will, as publicly as possible, to as many persons as he can persuade to attend his meetings, have admitted, insisted, bellowed, that he has always been a Ku Kluxer and a Fascist, that he has always hated Jews, colleges and good manners, and that the only thing he has ever disliked about Hitler is that he once tried to paint barns instead of leaving the barns the way God made them.

That is Research.
We're still rediscovering Rev. Bittery.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Monday, June 13, 2005

The Christian Right old and new


The novelist Sinclair Lewis had a good sense for things that are enduring. He went to his reward long before the Internet or personal computers came along. But his novels still sound remarkably current in many ways.

For example, his 1943 novel Gideon Planish tells a brief story to illustrate Research, which he calls "[o]ne of the most important activities of any liberal educational organization." The example, set in the late 1930s, is the Rev. Ezekiel Bittery. Apparently he had some problems with his formal credentials, because the narrator refers to him as the "ex-Reverend."

The first step is to gather a bunch of stories from newspapers about Brother Bittery and then write him to get some of his pamphlets. Then you have a few people go listen to his speeches live. With this procedure, it becomes well established that:

... Brother Bittery is a flannel-mouthed rabble-rouser who used to be charged not only with stealing the contents of the church poor-box, but of taking the box itself home to keep radishes in, and who at present if he isn't on the pay-roll of all the Fascists, is a bad collector.
After considering the matter for a couple of years, a Congressional committee proceeds to investigation, establishing for the record that "Mr. Bittery used to be a hell-fire preacher and is now a hell-fire Fascist."

More Research ensues, with scholars applying themselves to the phenomenon, which reveals "that Mr. Bittery used to favor lynching agnostics and now favors lynching socialists."

And during all this time, the Reverend Ezekiel himself will, as publicly as possible, to as many persons as he can persuade to attend his meetings, have admitted, insisted, bellowed, that he has always been a Ku Kluxer and a Fascist, that he has always hated Jews, colleges and good manners, and that the only thing he has ever disliked about Hitler is that he once tried to paint barns instead of leaving the barns the way God made them.

That is Research.
And that is the Rev. Bittery. He's still around, only now he has cable TV channels and Web sites. And the press coverage, and often awareness of his shenanigans among politicians and political activists, is often as spasmodic as the Research being conducted on the good Reverend in Lewis' novel.

Most recently, after the 2004 presidential elections, when the Republicans spun the results as having to do with "values" interpreted as conservative religious values, we saw a similar phenomenon. Columnists and Big Pundits discovered that, golly Pete, there are a lot of people out there who claim to speak for God and all his servants who fervently declare that they're not fond of Jews, colleges and good manners. (Or gays, or evolution, or even Britney Spears!) And there are always some earnest souls at these moments who hope that liberals will be able to convince these folks that the Democratic Party understands their concerns and kinda-sorta sympathizes.

But what we know as the Christian Right is not a new phenomenon. What is new is that they are now one of the most powerful groups within the Party that controls all three branches of the national government. They're making similar demands to those the flat-earthers always have. But now they're getting a more serious hearing in the national government that probably ever before.

And consequently, they are adding a sharp element of hell-fire fury to everyday politics.

Tags: , , , , ,