Showing posts with label trump family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trump family. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Don Jr. and the Russian lawyer

This story is obviously a big hunking deal. Here's Cenk Uygur's report on it, OOPS! Did Donald Trump Jr. Accidentally Admit To Russia Collusion? The Young Turks 07/10/2017:



Bob Dreyfuss talks about the Don Jr. story in Smoke Gives Way to Fire in the Trump-Russia Saga Rolling Stone 07/10/2017, "Until this weekend, there'd been lots of smoke, but little actual fire with regard to the Trump-Russia story. Now, the Trump administration is ablaze."

Charlie Pierce gives his take, What Do the Russians 'Have' on the Trump Family? Fear. Esquire Politics Blog 07/10/2017:

This, then, is Junior's official explanation: I thought we were colluding to ratfck the Democratic candidate, and the presidential election in general, but then she started talking about getting the mobsters' money back. Bitch set me up.

This is not an argument I would bring to court.
Josh Marshall today writes (The Puzzle Comes Into View TPM 07/11/2017):

With last night’s report in the Times, I think we are officially past the point of the ‘was there collusion’ question. There was. The President’s son now has the barest argument that he tried to get damaging information about Hillary Clinton which he was told came from a Russian government campaign to help his father become president, only to find it was insufficient.

To me this seems like a generally meaningless and highly implausible distinction and claim. We are now into the territory not of ‘was there collusion or contact’ but how substantial was it. Given the circumstantial evidence, it’s always seemed probable to me that there were contacts or perhaps winks and nods somewhere. There were just too many points of contact between Trumpland and people tied to the Russian government for their not to be. But was it mere encouragement and heads ups, or did it go deeper. Was there – to use that word everyone resists – an actual conspiracy involving members of the Trump entourage and members of the Russian government?
Josh also indulges in some journalistic speculation about what the sourcing of the Don Jr. leaks in The Sunday Afternoon of the Long Knives? TPM 07/10/2017.

And in this morning's surprising turn: David Smith, Donald Trump Jr posts emails of Russian offer to provide material on Clinton Guardian 07/11/2017:

The emails show music promoter Rob Goldstone telling the future US president’s son that “the crown prosecutor of Russia” had offered “to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary [Clinton] and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father”.

Goldstone adds: “This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr Trump”.

“If it’s what you say I love it,” replies Donald Trump Jr.
Yo!

Friday, April 07, 2017

Trump's military escalation in Syria, more refugees for Europe

This is a Morning Joe/MSNBC segment from today reporting on the Trump Family Business Administration's military strike on a Syrian airbase on Thursday, Challenges Ahead After Strike On Syrian Airfield 04/07/2017:



Über-realist Stephen Walt cautions us to not expect a lot from this strike, "The problem is that these attacks are a purely symbolic act devoid of real strategic significance. ... They might deter Assad from further chemical weapons use, but they don’t alter the situation on the ground, don’t make Syrian civilians significantly safer, and don’t move us closer to a solution." (Tom Friedman Is Calling for an Invasion of Syria. Trump Should Run the Other Way. Foreign Policy 04/07/2017)

Also this:



Every escalation of war in the Greater Middle East sends more refugees toward Europe. This article talks about an agreement that Italy is trying to negotiate with tribal leaders in southern Libya to house refugees that would otherwise head to Europe, Flüchtlinge: Europa nimmt Libyens Südgrenze ins Visier Standard 07.04.2017.

Prior to the NATO intervention in Libya - done with the most noble motives, of course! - Libya actually absorbed a lot of immigrants. Now that NATO has helped make Libya a failed state, they are generating their own refugees and are not able to absorb or restrict those coming from the south. I'm amazed how how disconnected the discussions of refugees and xenophobic rightwing populism in Europe are from the wars that generate the current refugee crisis, which turned acute in 2015.

We've gotten to the place where we can't even reign in the domestic arms proliferation problem. And neither party shows any great interest in trying to restrict the international one. Back in the day, John Kenneth Galbraith once suggested that the armaments industry be nationalized to restrict the private profit motive involved. Which might be a good idea if resulted in less military spending and arms trafficking.

I can't even remember the last time I've heard from any of our foreign policy experts or TV Pod Pundits even talking about trying to restrict the flow of arms to violent crisis areas like the Middle East. That at least is not one of those "options on the table."

The bold moderate Maverick McCain, the great moderate statesman who made Sarah Palin a national figure, loved the strike and wants to see more escalation, including creating "safe zones," grounding the Syria Air Force (!), and training Free Syrian Army, aka, the fabled Syrian Moderates, John McCain: President Trump Has Chance To Reboot With Americans Morning Joe/MSNBC 04/07/2017:



The Bold Maverick repeatedly invokes the "dead babies" produced by the gas attack this week, supposedly by the Syrian regime. His and other Republicans' concern about "dead babies" isn't so notable when it's American freedom bombs dealing the death.

Jordan Chariton talks about Hillary Clinton's position from Thursday before Trump's Syria strike occurred, Hillary Clinton Comes Out of Hiding To Warmonger TYT Politics 04/07/2017:







Congressman Adam Schiff in this interview more-or-less supports the attack. But he also cautioned that a regime change operation cannot be accomplished with air power and rockets alone, and argues that regime change should not be the object of US military operations in Syria, Adam Schiff: Donald Trump Should Seek Authorization Rachel Maddow Show/MSNBC 04/06/2017:



Even Schiff, who thinks there should have been a Congressional authorization prior to such an attack, still illustrate how strongly the default position for so many American politicians is to equate "action" with "military attacks."

But the Trump Family Business Administration doesn't seem to be much concerned about the legality of the Syria strike: Ryan Goodman, What Do Top Legal Experts Say About the Syria Strikes? Just Security 04/07/2017.

The Trump/alt-right Old Right Isolationist posture is not a non-interventionist posture, though they may object to some interventions. It's basically a hardcore militarist, nationalist viewpoint that disdain's "entangling alliances" because they might limit American unilateralism.

Here are a few notable Twitter responses: