There he goes again...

But there's nothing the least bit funny about it: Vice President's Remarks to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) 10/21/07. WINEP is a neoconservative-leaning think-tank, one of the network of those things that conservatives have built up over recent decades. The Center for Media and Democracy's Sourcewatch calls it "a highly effective think tank devoted to maintaining and strengthening the US-Israel alliance through advocacy in the media and lobbying the executive branch."

Cheney's speech included more justification of making war on Iran. The money quote on that seems to be, "our country and the entire international community cannot stand by as a terror-supporting state fulfills its most aggressive ambitions." But let's walk through it from the first.

This is the photo the White House Web site provides with the speech text. They deliberately present him immersed in darkness (with a guard on the alert for any common people who might shout out profane comments to His Majesty).

Dark Lord Cheney introduced himself this way:

In fact, most of you knew me long before anyone called me, Darth Vader. I've been asked if that nickname bothers me, and the answer is, no. After all, Darth Vader is one of the nicer things I've been called recently.

If you want to know the position of WINEP in the general scheme of things, here's what the Dark Lord says about them:

This is a period of great consequence for the Middle East, and, as always, the Washington Institute, under Rob Satloff's leadership, is providing a forum for calm, nonpartisan, rigorous discussion. For 22 years, you've brought clear and careful thinking to bear on some of the most complex and vital issues of the age. You've provided a venue for many fine scholars, and you've hosted countless forums for the sharing of ideas and discussions. It's an enormously productive enterprise, and your work is more relevant and useful today than ever before. All of us respect the Washington Institute for its high standards of research, study and insight. And so, for both myself and for the President, I want to congratulate the men and women of the Institute on the exceptional work that you do each and every day.

Let's face it. There are real enemies out there. But the bogeyman of The Terrorists that the Cheney-Bush administration has conjured up is a scarecrow. This image from Cheney's speech is just comic-book fantasy:

The ideological struggle that's playing out in the Middle East today - the struggle against radical extremists - is going to concern America certainly for the remainder of our administration, and well into the future. On September 11th, 2001, we suffered a heavy blow, right here at home, at the hands of extremists who plotted the attacks from an outpost thousands of miles from our shores. Since that terrible morning, Americans have properly called this a war. For their part, the terrorists agree. The difference is they began calling it a war a good many years prior to 9/11. And they've been waging that war with clear objectives, aggressive tactics, and a strategy they want to carry out at any cost.

They've stated their objectives. The terrorists want to end all American and Western influence in the Middle East. Their goal in that region is to seize control of a country so they have a base from which they can launch attacks and wage war against governments that do not meet their demands. Ultimately they seek to establish a totalitarian empire through the Middle East, and outward from there. They want to arm themselves with chemical, biological or nuclear weapons; they want to destroy Israel; they intimidate all Western countries; and to cause mass death here in the United States.

This is a case of the Big Lie. You can pull on any one thread of this construct and it collapses. But if you buy the package, then the United States is at permanent war with most of the world. Forever, basically. I'll just say here that there are lots of cults that have lots of goals that most of us would not find desirable. Some of them can do real harm. Like Al Qa'ida. We should deal with those. And, you know, make the airport and shipping port security work well. But just because some nasty bearded men in caves somewhere in backwoods Waziristan have crazy ambitions doesn't mean that we have the right or the need to go shooting up any country the Dark Lord wants to attack for whatever reason.

We had a commenter the other day getting messages from space aliens through his teeth. His teeth probably tell him some pretty scary things sometimes. But the rest of us probably don't need to get too worked up about it. Much less go start killing more people somewhere.

Speaking of getting messages through their teeth, Bernard Lewis used to be a respected scholar. But some people just get loopy in their old age. The Dark Lord quotes him:

Dr. Bernard Lewis explained the terrorists' reasoning this way: "During the Cold War," Dr. Lewis wrote, "two things came to be known and generally recognized in the Middle East concerning the two rival superpowers. If you did anything to annoy the Russians, punishment would be swift and dire. If you said or did anything against the Americans, not only would there be no punishment; there might even be some possibility of reward, as the usual anxious procession of diplomats and politicians, journalists and scholars and miscellaneous others came with their usual pleading inquiries: 'What have we done to offend you? What can we do to put it right?'" End quote.

The rightwingers just don't worry these days if one of their major arguments runs directly counter to another. Here, we see that the godless Communist Russian Evil Empire knew how to deal with them thar terrorists. Maybe that's why the Dark Lord adopted torture techniques learned from the Soviets. But then how many times have we heard Cheney fans talk about how our brilliant support of the noble freedom-loving mujahideen in Afghanistan (aka, murdering Muslim terrorists, when they're not on Our Side) led to the total downfall of the Soviet Union? Sure they have other one-cause interpretations of that event, too. But consistency doesn't bedevil them much.

I saw a comment the other day from a Brezhnev-era Soviet scholar who said you could read every Soviet book on ideology in 20 minutes because they all just repeated the same things that the other ideology books said. With their growing enthusiasm for things East Bloc, the Cheneyites seem to have reached that point with their war arguments. They don't worry about consistency, so long as they get to send more soldiers to kill more foreigners in wars of their choosing.

Here's the Dark Lord defense of the day for his torture program:

Most everyone understood this when the memory of 9/11 was still fresh. Most everyone understood that it would be a luxury and a fantasy to suppose that we could answer terrorism without going on the offensive against the terrorists themselves. Because we've been focused, because we've refused to let down our guard, we've gone now more than six years without another 9/11. No one can promise that there won't be another attack; the terrorists hit us first and they are hell-bent on doing it again.

We know this because of their public declarations and because of the intelligence we've gathered through monitoring and, yes, through interrogations. There's been a good deal of misinformation about the CIA detainee program, and unfair comments have been made about America's intentions and the conduct of America's intelligence officers. Many of the details are understandably classified. Yet the basic facts are these. A small number of high-value detainees have gone through the program run by the CIA. This is different from Guantanamo Bay, where select captured terrorists are sent and interrogated by the Department of Defense according to the Army Field Manual. The CIA program involves tougher customers and tougher interrogations.

The procedures are designed to be safe, legal, in full compliance with the nation's laws and our treaty obligations. They've been carefully reviewed by the Department of Justice. The program is run by highly trained professionals who understand their obligations under the law. And the program has uncovered a wealth of information that has foiled specific attacks, information that has on numerous occasions made the difference between life and death.

The United States is a country that takes human rights seriously. We do not torture. We're proud of our country and what it stands for. We expect all who serve America to conduct themselves with honor. And we enforce the rules. Several years ago, when abuses were committed at Abu Ghraib -- a facility having nothing to do with the high-value detainee program -- when those abuses came to light, Americans were mortified and rightly outraged. The wrongdoers were arrested, prosecuted and punished, as justice demanded. America is a fair and decent country, and President Bush has made it clear, both publicly and privately, that our duty to uphold the laws and standards of this nation admits no exceptions in wartime. As he put it, "We are in a fight for our principles, and our first responsibility is to live by them."

If you can swallow that, if you had been in the American South in the 1950s, you would have had no trouble believing that blacks were lynch-murdered because they raped white women, or tried to. It's the same mentality. I'm sick of people trying to pretend there's anything to the torture program but violence, sadism and state terror.

Then of course, he promised he would show Will and stick it out in the Iraq War.

But this seems to be the meat of this particular war-propaganda speech, and I'll quote it here at length:

Across the Middle East, further progress will depend on responsible conduct by regional governments; respect for the sovereignty of neighbors; compliance with international agreements; peaceful words, and peaceful actions. And if you apply all these measures, it becomes immediately clear that the government of Iran falls far short, and is a growing obstacle to peace in the Middle East.

Given the recent appearance by the Iranian President in New York City, no one can fail to understand the nature of the regime this man represents. He has called repeatedly for the destruction of Israel; has spoken of his yearning for a world without the United States. Under their current rulers, the people of Iran live in a climate of fear and intimidation, with secret police, arbitrary detentions, and a hint of violence in the air. (my emphasis)

How even a major-league creep like Cheney can still say things like this given his own methods of governance is beyond me; maybe he had a sarcastic smirk as he said it, I don't know.

And let's be real. Does anyone actually believe that the Republicans give a s**t about the rights and freedoms of Iranians? Other than as a justification for killing a lot of them in war?

In the space of a generation, the regime has solidified its grip on the country and grown ever more arrogant and brutal toward the Iranian people. Journalists are intimidated. Religious minorities are persecuted. A good many dissidents and freedom advocates have been murdered, or have simply disappeared. Visiting scholars who've done nothing wrong have been seized and jailed.

This same regime that approved of hostage-taking in 1979, that attacked Saudi and Kuwaiti shipping in the 1980s, that incited suicide bombings and jihadism in the 1990s and beyond, is now the world's most active state sponsor of terror. As to its next-door neighbor, Iraq, the Iranian government claims to be a friend that supports regional stability. In fact, it is a force for the opposite. As General Petraeus has noted, Iran's Quds Force is trying to set up a "Hezbollah-like force to serve its interests and to fight a proxy war against the Iraqi state and coalition forces in Iraq." At the same time, Iran is "responsible for providing the weapons, the training, the funding and, in some cases, the direction for operations that have indeed killed U.S. soldiers."

Operating largely in the shadows, ...

I need to pause here. If any of Joseph Stalin's head of the secret police was more obsessed with secrecy and "operating largely in the shadows", I would be astonished. The level of psychological projection going on from today's Republican Party is just amazing.

Operating largely in the shadows, Iran attempts to hide its hands through the use of militants who target and kill coalition and Iraqi security forces. Iran's real agenda appears to include promoting violence against the coalition. Fearful of a strong, independent, Arab Shia community emerging in Iraq, one that seeks religious guidance not in Qom, Iran, but from traditional sources of Shia authority in Najaf and Karbala, the Iranian regime also aims to keep Iraq in a state of weakness that prevents Baghdad from presenting a threat to Tehran.

Perhaps the greatest strategic threat that Iraq's Shiites face today in - is - in consolidating their rightful role in Iraq's new democracy is the subversive activities of the Iranian regime. The Quds Force, a branch of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, is the defender of the theocracy. The regime has used the Quds Force to provide weapons, money, and training to terrorists and Islamic militant groups abroad, including Hamas; Palestinian Islamic Jihad; militants in the Balkans; the Taliban and other anti-Afghanistan militants; and Hezbollah terrorists trying to destabilize Lebanon's democratic government.

The Iranian regime's efforts to destabilize the Middle East and to gain hegemonic power is a matter of record.

I'm not commenting on hypocrisy here. This is so far beyond hypocrisy that the word doesn't begin to describe it. The point of the Bush Doctrine in the Middle East was to destabilize the authoritarian regime and supposedly bring forth peaceful, pro-American and pro-Israeli democracies. And it's not as though people in the Middle East are unaware of this. The Dark Lord's nonsense is to fire up the true believers at home to cheer for more war and killing.

And now, of course, we have the inescapable reality of Iran's nuclear program; a program they claim is strictly for energy purposes, but which they have worked hard to conceal; a program carried out in complete defiance of the international community and resolutions of the U.N. Security Council. Iran is pursuing technology that could be used to develop nuclear weapons. The world knows this. The Security Council has twice imposed sanctions on Iran and called on the regime to cease enriching uranium. Yet the regime continues to do so, and continues to practice delay and deception in an obvious attempt to buy time.

Just like Saddam Hussein was pursuing "delay and deception" in concealing his massive arsenal of WMDs, which were also an "inescapable reality". Remember, this is the man who said days before the invasion of Iraq was launched that the Iraqi regime actually had nuclear weapons.

Given the nature of Iran's rulers, the declarations of the Iranian President, and the trouble the regime is causing throughout the region - including direct involvement in the killing of Americans - our country and the entire international community cannot stand by as a terror-supporting state fulfills its most aggressive ambitions.

The Iranian regime needs to know that if it stays on its present course, the international community is prepared to impose serious consequences. The United States joins other nations in sending a clear message: We will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon.

The irresponsible conduct of the ruling elite in Tehran is a tragedy for all Iranians. The regime has passed up numerous opportunities to be a positive force in the Middle East. For more than a generation, it had only isolated a great nation, suppressed a great people, and subjected them to economic hardship that gets worse every year. The citizens of Iran deserve none of this. They are the proud heirs of a culture of learning, humanity and beauty that reaches back many centuries. Iranian civilization has produced shining achievements, from the Persian Book of Kings, to the poetry of Rumi and Khayyam, to celebrated achievements in astronomy and mathematics, to art and music admired on every continent. The Iran of today -- a nation of 70 million, a majority of them under the age of 30 -- is a place of unlimited potential. And the Iranian people have every right to be free from oppression, from economic deprivation, and tyranny in their own country.

The spirit of freedom is stirring in Iran. The voices of change and peaceful dissent will not be silent. We can expect to hear more from the courageous reformers, the bloggers, and the advocates of rights for women and ethnic and religious minorities, because these men and women are more loyal to their country than to the regime. Despite the regime's anti-American propaganda, the Iranian people can know that America respects them, cares about their troubles, and stands firmly on the side of liberty, human dignity and individual rights. America looks forward to the day when Iranians reclaim their destiny; the day that our two countries, as free and democratic nations, can be the closest of friends.

This kind of praise for the wonderful people of Iraq coming from the lips of the Dark Lord can only mean that he intends to kill large numbers of them in war.

Tags: cheney, dick cheney, iraq war, iran war