Helena spells out three problems with that idea:
With our troops in Iraq, the United States is part of the neighborhood. And what happens there that affects our position in Iraq is very definitely an American concern.
- The hardware the IDF would use to strike Israel would certainly include US-supplied items, all of which are supplied on the basis of explicit agreements that they will be used only for defensive purposes.
- As Stephanopoulos was smart enough to point out, the US controls the air-space in Iraq, Saudi, Arabia, and other countries that Israel would need to overfly in any air-launched attack on Iraq.
- Finally-- and this for me is the clincher--It is US forces, not Israeli forces, that are "on the front-lines" against Iran. If Israel attacks Iran, the Iranian government can justifiably assume, based in part on points 1 and 2 above, that it did so with at least US collusion, if not active US partnership. On this basis Iran would be entitled to respond to any Israeli attack by counter-attacking against not only Israel but also the many, very vulnerable military assets that the US has very near Iran's borders and coastline-- whether in Iraq, in and around the Gulf, or in Afghanistan.
Tags: helena cobban, iran, israel, joe biden
No comments:
Post a Comment