Showing posts with label mek. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mek. Show all posts

Friday, April 06, 2012

The US and the MEK terrorist group

Seymour Hersh reports on US covert actions, aka, "black ops", involving the Iranian terrorist group Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK) in Our Men in Iran? New Yorker 04/06/2012:

It was here [a base in Nevada] that the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) conducted training, beginning in 2005, for members of the Mujahideen-e-Khalq, a dissident Iranian opposition group known in the West as the M.E.K. The M.E.K. had its beginnings as a Marxist-Islamist student-led group and, in the nineteen-seventies, it was linked to the assassination of six American citizens. It was initially part of the broad-based revolution that led to the 1979 overthrow of the Shah of Iran. But, within a few years, the group was waging a bloody internal war with the ruling clerics, and, in 1997, it was listed as a foreign terrorist organization by the State Department. In 2002, the M.E.K. earned some international credibility by publicly revealing—accurately—that Iran had begun enriching uranium at a secret underground location. Mohamed ElBaradei, who at the time was the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear monitoring agency, told me later that he had been informed that the information was supplied by the Mossad. The M.E.K.'s ties with Western intelligence deepened after the fall of the Iraqi regime in 2003, and JSOC began operating inside Iran in an effort to substantiate the Bush Administration’s fears that Iran was building the bomb at one or more secret underground locations. Funds were covertly passed to a number of dissident organizations, for intelligence collection and, ultimately, for anti-regime terrorist activities. Directly, or indirectly, the M.E.K. ended up with resources like arms and intelligence. Some American-supported covert operations continue in Iran today, according to past and present intelligence officials and military consultants. [my emphasis]
There is a big difference between intelligence operations aimed and getting information and covert action aimed at fomenting violence or activity against a hostile regime or directly committing acts of violence. However romantic an image many people may have of the latter, the risk/return ratio on such actions is very high. And can even constitute acts of war.

The fact that the United States has been involved in actions like training the MEK and possibly in terrorist attacks inside Iran needs to be very much a part of the discussion of US policy toward Iran.

Five Iranian nuclear scientists have been assassinated since 2007. M.E.K. spokesmen have denied any involvement in the killings, but early last month NBC News quoted two senior Obama Administration officials as confirming that the attacks were carried out by M.E.K. units that were financed and trained by Mossad, the Israeli secret service. NBC further quoted the Administration officials as denying any American involvement in the M.E.K. activities. The former senior intelligence official I spoke with seconded the NBC report that the Israelis were working with the M.E.K., adding that the operations benefitted from American intelligence. He said that the targets were not "Einsteins"; "The goal is to affect Iranian psychology and morale," he said, and to "demoralize the whole system—nuclear delivery vehicles, nuclear enrichment facilities, power plants." Attacks have also been carried out on pipelines. He added that the operations are "primarily being done by M.E.K. through liaison with the Israelis, but the United States is now providing the intelligence." An adviser to the special-operations community told me that the links between the United States and M.E.K. activities inside Iran had been long-standing. "Everything being done inside Iran now is being done with surrogates," he said. [my emphasis]
Aside from the advisability, or the lack thereof, for such actions, Glenn Greenwald points out that they are literally illegal. Because MEK is on the official US list of terrorist organizations, and it is specifically illegal to provide money, weapons or training to such groups: Report: U.S. trained terror group Salon 04/06/2012.

Tags: , ,

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

More on MEK supporters lobbying for a listed terrorist group, so far without prosecution

Alyona Minkovski of the The Alyona Show did a segment on the MEK lobbying story, MSM: Ed Rendell MEK Investigation 03/13/2012:



The YouTube segment includes the following summary:

All we hear is non-stop election coverage coming from the mainstream media; we also keep hearing a myth perpetuated by pundits and GOP candidates that rising gas prices actually have something to do with who's in office. And the President recently has been repeating a line to the press, regarding the fear mongering over Iran, that beating war drums might have an effect. However, there's something else Alyona will focus on that also fits into this equation. There have been political ads advocating for the MEK, an exiled Iranian group, to be delisted from the State Department's list of terrorist organizations. The MEK wants a change in the power structure in Iran and so do a lot of people in Washington. We've discussed this before, that there are a number of politicians and officials that have been paid by the MEK to give speeches and advocate on their behalf.
Tags: , ,

Monday, March 12, 2012

Prominent Americans' paid advocacy for MEK terrorist group

Glenn Greenwald (Washington’s high-powered terrorist supporters 03/12/2012) and Marcy Wheeler (Ed Rendell Defends Material Support of the "Right" Terrorists Emptywheel 03/12/2012) are right, as they so often are: if the law is going to recognize advocacy in coordination with an officially-designated terrorist group as a crime, then advocates for the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) should be prosecuted and imprisoned just as supporters of other officially-designated terrorist groups are. In my mind, agreeing to paid advocacy is even more serious than advocacy, though the law goes too far in criminalizing the latter.

MEK is a Kurdish terrorist group that supported Saddam Hussein and opposes the current Iranian regime. Glenn and Marcy aren't just indulging in hyperbole when they write that American supporters of the MEK are breaking the law. They are. The occasion of their posts is news that the Treasury Department is investigating for Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania for his paid advocacy on behalf of the MEK. And by paid advocacy, we're not talking about pocket money - at least not what most people would consider pocket change. Glenn reports:

As but one example, Rendell, the former Democratic Governor of Pennsylvania and current MSNBC contributor, was paid $20,000 for a 10- minute speech before a MEK gathering, and has been a stalwart advocate of the group ever since.

Even for official Washington, where elite crimes are tolerated as a matter of course, this level of what appears to be overt criminality — taking large amounts of money from a designated Terrorist group, appearing before its meetings, meeting with its leaders, then advocating on its behalf — is too much to completely overlook.
He cites Scott Peterson's report from last August, Iranian group's big-money push to get off US terrorist list Christian Science Monitor 08/08/2011:

The contracts can range up to $100,000 and include several appearances. They sometimes explicitly state, according to the State Dept. official, that "We are not a front organization for the MEK."

The speaking events have created some extraordinary spectacles, including that of US heavyweights sharing the stage with the MEK's self-declared "president-elect" Maryam Rajavi. At a mid-June MEK rally in Paris, for example, Mrs. Rajavi was flanked by five rows of former top US and European officials. The noisy throng of thousands of well-orchestrated MEK supporters, draped in yellow vests and waving flags, banners, and balloons as clouds of confettifell, looked like an American political convention.
Other Americans who have taken paid gigs advocating for the terrorist group include John Bolton, Andrew Card, Gen. Wesley Clark, Gen. James Conway, P.J. Crowley, Howard Dean, Louis Freeh, Rudy Giuliani, Porter Goss, Lee Hamilton (Mr. Democratic bipartisanship himself!), Michael Hayden, Gen. James Jones, Michael Mukasey, Gen. Peter Pace, Bill Richardson, Tom Ridge, Gen. Hugh Shelton, James Woolsey, Gen. Anthony Zinni, . Yes, that would be antiwar Democrat Howard Dean in that group. It's a happily well-paid bipartisan group, matching supposed foreign-policy pragmatists and liberal like Dean and Wesley Clark with blithering warmongers like James Woolsey and John Bolton. As Cyndi Lauper says, "Money, money changes everything."

Even if it weren't as blatantly illegal as it appears to be, it doesn't say anything good about the judgment of Howard Dean and Wesley Clark that they would choose to advocate for a nasty bunch like the MEK, for money or not. (Or any of the rest of them, for that matter; those were the two most surprising for me.) Peterson reports on the MEK itself:

US government documents frequently use the term "cult-like" when describing the MEK, and describe "years of ideological training" for members akin to "brainwashing." The MEK has long denied that it is a cult and routinely charges critics with being agents of the Islamic Republic.

The MEK says it renounced violence in 2001, after claiming responsibility for 350 attacks in 2000 and 2001, according to a RAND tabulation. It is not known to have carried out any attacks for several years, though a 2004 FBI report found that the group was "currently actively involved in planning and executing acts of terrorism."

That conclusion was based on wiretaps of calls between MEK bases and headquarters in Iraq, France, and Los Angeles that discussed "specific acts of terrorism to include bombings" – and were corroborated by French intelligence and German police wiretaps, according to the FBI report.

Militant groups can change. Both Sinn Fein in Northern Ireland and the Palestinian Liberation Organization, for example, used violence before becoming influential political forces in their own right. The MEK is one of those, say its increasing number of American advocates.
He notes that MEK's "record includes assassinations of US military advisers and attacks on US diplomats".

The MEK's lobbying push to get off the US terrorist list is closely related to efforts to promoting an American war with Iran, whose regime the MEK opposes.

Tags: , ,