Showing posts with label shakira. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shakira. Show all posts

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Shakira's new song and video, "Clandestino"

Shakira has a new video of her song "Clandestino" with Maluma, Shakira, Maluma - Clandestino (Official Video) 07/27/2018:


Friday, September 25, 2015

Shakira performs at the UN in honor of Pope Francis

Shakira performed for Pope Francis at the UN today (Friday), Shakira - Imagine (Live at the UN's General Assembly 2015):



The text at her YouTube channel says, "Shakira, before the Pope at the UN in NYC, dedicates her performance of John Lennon's Imagine to Aylan and Galip Kurdi and all the children turned refugees due to the Syrian war / Shakira, frente al Papa en la ONU, dedica su actuación a los hermanos Aylan y Galip Kurdi y a los niños refugiados por la guerra."

I can't quite tell from the reports I've seen, but it seems as though the Pope may have left the Assembly hall before she sang. (Shakira le canta 'Imagine' al Papa en la ONU El Periódico 25.09.2015)

Also on Shakira's agenda was meeting with the attorneys of her former boyfriend Antonio de la Rúa to try to settle a lawsuit in which De la Rúa is demanding a portion of her earnings from the time they were together. (Shakira viaja a Nueva York para ver al Papa y arreglar cuentas con su ex El Espectador 24.09.2015)

I don't see Shakira in the following video herself, although she has very publicly expressed her solidarity with it. (Shakira, Santana, y Gloria Estefan cantarán contra Donald Trump El Espectador/EFE 24.09.2015)

It's a video made in solidarity with American immigrants and American-born Latinos against the racist, xenophobic, God-hating immigrant-bashing being practiced by Donald Trump and the supporters of his white-trash bigotry, Video musical "Todos Somos Mexicanos" Univision Noticias 09/21/2015:


Wednesday, May 08, 2013

Shakira and Blake Shelton on "The Voice"

Shakira and Blake Shelton, both currently coaches on The Voice, do a duet on Need You Now:



Tags: ,

Friday, March 08, 2013

The Grand Bargain to cut benefits on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid is just as bad an idea now as in 2009

Digby has been closely following President Obama-Brüning's effort to strike a Grand Bargain to cut benefits on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (aka, "entitlements") since before his first inauguration in 2009. She's been the best analyst I know of on the whole rotten idea.

In How to succeed as an opposition party without really trying Hullabaloo 03/08/2013, she reminds us again what a bad concept in was for everyone except Republican greedheads like Peter Peterson who have been looking to get their hands on the Social Security cash flow and rake huge investment banking profits off of it:

The original calculation of the Grand Bargain was always daft: deficit reduction in a time of massive unemployment and a moribund economy. And even worse that the Bargain was defined as some sort of amorphous "revenue" from people who won't even feel it in exchange for benefits cuts to some of the neediest people in the country. This is also known as a "balanced approach" (to a problem that doesn't doesn't need fixing.) That we've taken a hatchet to discretionary programs is just frosting on the cake. Well played.

The bottom line is this: I think it would be nice to raise some more "revenue." But it is definitely not worth this price and I doubt very seriously it will last any longer than the Clinton tax hikes lasted --- that is until the Republicans regain the presidency. They are not going to overnight become friendly to the idea of progressive taxation, so whatever tiny little accommodation we get now is it, and it's very temporary. But the people of this country will be suffering for many, many years from the cuts to vital programs that were given up in this Bargain.
In an earlier post, The Village: "very, very privileged people wanting to make sure they cut spending on everybody else?" 03/07/2013, she writes:

... we've had a bipartisan National Security policy for decades, one that has always placed a premium on our continued global military hegemony. There is nothing particularly new about that, as appalling as it is. But a Democratic president leading the way to cutting Social Security and Medicare is something new. There was a time when that would have been unthinkable. I've said it before, but it's more and more obvious to me that if the Democratic Party sells out its constituents on "entitlements" --- which they fought for and defended for over half a century, particularly at a time when their authentic democratic political power is stronger than it's been in over three decades, I'm hard pressed to see what the rationale for their continued existence really is. [my emphasis in bold]
She refers to an article on Social Security by Tom Edsall, who she describes as a "highly respected political reporter Tom Edsall, The War On Entitlements New York Times 03/06/2013.

Whenever referring to Edsall, I feel obligated to include the qualifier that, although he does some solid reporting and has for years, his analysis has an aggravating liberal-concern-troll aspect that has irritated me since I read his Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics (1991). He often analyses in terms that broadly agree with conservative talking points of the moment, thought phrased in a way to imply that he's a liberal who views his results sorrowfully. After having seen his arguments so often tending that way, I'm tempted to read that even into his conclusion in this piece:

Elite anxiety over entitlement-driven budget deficits and accumulating national debt has created a powerful class in the nation’s capital. The agenda of this class is in many respects on a collision course with mounting demands for action by those lower down the ladder to address the threat to government social insurance programs. Intransigent opposition by the better off and their representatives to raising the necessary revenue means that not only Social Security and Medicare face a budgetary ax.

Among the additional likely casualties: WIC, which provides free nutrition for women, infants and children; long-term and emergency unemployment compensation benefits; low-income housing vouchers; vaccines for poor children; schooling for children with disabilities; special education; preschool programs; child care for disadvantaged and vulnerable children; after-school programs; treatment of the mentally ill; and meals for sick and homebound seniors.

This conflict could not have come at a more difficult time: the United States is in the midst of a zero sum struggle requiring politicians to pick losers, not winners. The population of those over 65 is set to multiply, with longevity steadily increasing even as median annual household income for the population at large has shrunk to $51,584 in January 2013 from $54,000 in 2008.

In this kind of conflict over limited goods, one of the most valuable resources that can get lost in the fray is the wisdom of the electorate at large. In this case, the electorate is pointing toward progressive tax increases for those closer to the top far more readily than members of the political class, for whom high-earners are a crucial source of campaign contributions.
But however Edsall himself regards the value of that outcome, he is correct in describing the strong pressures to cut benefits on Social Security and Medicare and other programs that benefit others than only the super-rich. Pressures actively encouraged right now by Medicare opponent Barack Obama.

Digby's comment on the effect of the Democrats supporting cuts in benefits to benefits on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, "I'm hard pressed to see what the rationale for their continued existence really is", really resonates with me. Although it's like what I think of a classic Jesuit comment that first makes me think, "Something's not quite right about that." But then I find myself not being able to think about the issue without taking account of that comment.

I have a hard time envisioning what that might mean in practice for the Democrats to lose "the rationale for their continued existence." There's always the standard third-party slogans to apply: there's not a dime's worth of difference between the two parties, if you vote for the lesser of two evils you'll get what you vote for, etc.

But even in a world in which politicians wouldn't even bother to pretend they were anything but corporate whores - how hard many of them are already to that point might be a matter of some discussion - there would still be competition between individuals to be first in line to collect their fees. And as long as elections are happening, there is always some room for people advocating positions not 100% consistent with a state of corporate whoredom to get a hearing, and even occasionally get elected. Even in the one-party segregated South, there were intense contests, including contests around issues, among candidates in the Democratic Party primaries as they competed for a majority of the white vote, nonwhites not normally having a vote to cast.

But I do think a Democratic Party that joins the Republicans, as Medicare opponent Obama-Brüning wants to do, in opposing the most basic social "safety net" programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, will put us into a fundamentally different political era for the Democratic Party.

I'm confident in saying it will not look like the postpartisan, end-of-ideology state on which Obama-Brüning seems to be so fixed. That happy state in which all "ideological" issues are settled: the requirement that rich people pay taxes to support their country, women grousing about how they should be able to control their own ladyparts, minorities complaining about being discriminated against, aspiring mall shooters griping that libruls are trying to limit their access to guns, workers thinking they have a right to join unions, old people expecting some kind of retirement in minimal dignity and with access to health care, all those will be resolved. All that will be left to discuss in politics will be technocratic issues, like which wars we should start this year, how much public land should be handed over to the extractive industries and at how low a price, and which new job-exporting, antilabor international trade agreements should be approved. The annoying public would happily accede to the advice of their betters in the corporate boardrooms, Wall Street casinos, K Street lobbying firms, the Pentagon and the pundits on TV talk-fests. And they will do their civic duty to show up every couple of years to select which corporate whore they think has greater celebrity appeal.

Shakira doesn't necessarily come first to mind when you think "protest song." But her song "Timor" comes to mind in this context:

It's alright, it's alright
The system never fails
The good guys are in power
And the bad guys are in jail

It's alright, it's alright
Just as long as we can vote
We'll have a democracy
And that's what we promote

Isn't it? Isn't it?
That is on her Oral Fixation Vol. 2 album from 2005, when George W. Bush was using "democracy promotion" as a prominent justification for perpetual war.



Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Shakira at the Summit of the Americas (Cumbre de las Américas)

Cuba wasn't invited to the Summit of the Americas this weekend. But Shakira Mebarak was. She gave a talk in Spanish of roughly 20 minutes about her main social cause, early childhood education.

Discurso de Shakira en la Cumbre de las Américas 04/13/2012:



She also sang the Colombian national hymn there (Shakira canta Himno Nacional de Colombia YouTube date 04/14/2012):



In her speech, she explicitly endorses the concept advocated by management-theory guru Michael Porter of established "shared value" as the goal of corporations. (Creating Shared Value Harvard Business Review Jan 2011) It's scarcely a radical notion, but in Porter's version it explicitly rejects maximizing profits as a corporate goal.

So it's blasphemy against the contemporary theology of the Great God Free Market.

At around 2:55, the video shows one member of the audience who seems to be literally squirming at her statement on the need for more "social investment". She goes on to ask, "I ask myself, Why don't we take this immence opportunity that we have in our hands to fight poverty?"

Tags: ,

Wednesday, December 07, 2011

Shakira

Shakira doing my favorite song from her Sale el Sol album, "Antes de las Seis":



Tags: ,

Sunday, September 05, 2010

More of Shakira at Rock in Rio (Madrid) 2010

Gordita, a duet with Rene of the group Calle 13:



Gitana:



"Hips Don't Lie", with a slow intro:



Tags: ,

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Shakira Mubarak, "Sale el Sol"

From her appearance in Madrid at the annual Rock in Rio event, 2010. This song, "Sale el Sol", is one from her upcoming album:



Tags: ,

Thursday, April 29, 2010

What Shakira says

Not that I ever need an excuse to watch Shakira's videos. But this is the most explicit stand I ever recall her taking on a particular political issue. And this woman really is smart. She also knows the American Constitution better than any of the Tea Party clowns that I've heard so far.



Tags: , ,

Monday, December 07, 2009

Shakira Mebarak at Oxford Union

Shakira Mebarak - yes, the "hips don't lie" Shakira - spoke on Monday at the prestigious Oxford Union, as reported on her Web site: Shakira, Invitada de Honor Disertó en la Universidad de Oxford 12/07/09. Her topic was the democratization of education. She was there in her capacity as a UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador and in particular in her role as an advocate for children's education via her Fundación Pies Descalzos, which has build schools for children in her native Colombia.

She also mentioned another topic: "Así es como quiero que la juventud del año 2060 nos vea: que nuestra misión por la paz global consistió en enviar 30,000 educadores a Afganistán y no 30,000 soldados." (This is the way I want young people of the year 2060 to see us: that our mission for global peace consisted in sending 30,000 educators to Afghanistan and not 30,000 soldiers.)

Amen to that!

Tags: , ,

Sunday, October 04, 2009

Shakira Mebarak on Mercedes Sosa


Mercedes Sosa and Shakira

The Colombian superstar Shakira Mebarak posted this note on her Facebook page paying tribute to the Argentine singer and pro-democracy human rights activist Mercedes Sosa, who passed away Sunday (today) at age 74. I notice that she signed the note "Shakira Mebarak" and not just Shakira; in most of her publicity she uses the single name. The text of her note:

Mercedes fue la voz más grande y tuvo el más grande corazón para el que sufre. Fue la voz de sus hermanos de la tierra que elevó el canto del dolor y la justicia.

Artista conmovedora y admirada primera en la lucha solidaria.

Sufrió el exilio dando ejemplo de coraje y volvió con naturalidad a su sitio de elegida.

Nos deja la sencillez de su gesto y de su danza y la luz de su palabra y de su afecto.

Su canto era la idea: no repetía estrofas sino que transmitía el pensamiento hondo del verso y de la música.

Cantó a su gente y su tierra americana, pero su canto universal fue oído en todo el mundo.

La voz de Mercedes resonaba en el corazón como un abrazo.

Fue un honor cantar con ella. Lo hizo tan fácil, como una hermana mayor en el canto y en la causa de los niños.

"¿Nada quedará de mi paso aquí en la tierra? Al menos versos, al menos cantos", decía el ancestro mexicano. Mercedes deja el mundo lleno de sus cantos, poblado de sus versos.

Somos más buenos después de haberla conocido.
Nos mostró que la canción puede ser una enseñanza.

Shakira Mebarak
Mercedes Sosa 1973

My translation (I tend to go for the literal meaning and can't pretend to capture the grace of Shakira's Spanish prose):

Mercedes was the greatest voice and had the biggest heart for those who suffer. She was the voice of her brothers and sister of the earth, who raised the song of pain and justice.

A moving artist and admired above all in the solidarity of struggle.

She suffered exile, giving an example of courage, and returned naturally to her chosen place. [She was exiled during the brutal military dictatorship of 1976-83 but returned to Argentina in 1982.]

She left us the simplicity of her gesture and of her dance and the light of her word and of her feelings.

Her song was the idea: don't repeat strophes without transmitting the inner thought of the verse and of the music.

She sang to her people and to her American land, but her universal song was heard in all the world.

Mercedes' voice resonates in the heart like an embrace.

It was an honor to sing with her. She made it so easy, like an older sister in the song and in the cause of the children.

"Will nothing remain of my through through here on the earth. At least verses, at least songs", said the Mexican ancestor. Mercedes left the world full of her song, populated by her verses.

We are better after having known her.
She showed us that a song can be an education.
Additional articles on Mercedes Sosa:

Mercedes Sosa My Space page

Emotivo adiós a "La Negra" Sosa en el Congreso Clarín (Argentina) 04.10.2009

Mucho más que una cantante extraordinaria Clarín (Argentina) 04.10.2009

Argentine singer Mercedes Sosa, 'voice of Latin America,' dies at 74 CNN 10/04/09

Argentine folk legend Mercedes Sosa dead at 74 Dawn (Pakistan) 04.10.2009

Tags: , ,

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Shakira Mebarak's lycanthropy video

Now we know why the werewolf lifestyle is attractive to some people:


Tags: ,

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Shakira Mebarak on Michael Jackson's passing

Shakira posted this on her Facebook page 06/27/09:

Michael Jackson was the King of artistic genius, of dance, of innovation and fantasy. He reinvented the pop genre and found a new way to articulate music through images that will last forever. Of his voice Frank Sinatra once said that he was "the only singer I've seen who was better than me." With his death, the King is transformed into a Legend for all time. My profound sympathy to his family, fans and loved ones.

Shakira

Michael Jackson fue sin duda el rey de la genialidad artística, del movimiento, de la innovación y la fantasía. Él reinventó el género de la música Pop y encontró una nueva forma de articular la música con las imágenes que será recordada para siempre. Por su calidad de voz, Frank Sinatra lo definió como "el único cantante que he visto mejor que yo". Con su muerte, el Rey se transforma en una Leyenda para todos los tiempos. Mi cariño va a toda su familia, fans y a todos sus seres queridos.

Shakira
Tags: ,

Monday, January 19, 2009

We Are One Concert


Even Colombia's Shakira Mebarak showed up!

It sounds like the "We Are One" concert on the National Mall on Sunday was quite an event.

I had a hard time finding early video clips. MTV.com has a few short ones, 'We Are One' Inaugural Concert: Highlights. Here's the MTV clip of Usher, Stevie Wonder and Shakira singing "Higher Ground".



Tags: ,

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Shakira's New Year's Eve

Well, it's too late to a get a visa and probably a flight. Unless you've got some serious connections.

But Shakira is doing a New Year's Eve show this year at the Emirates Palace Hotel in Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates).


According to this article, Shakira's Arab fixation by Kelly Crane Gulf News 12/23/08, she's going to do some singing in Arabic.

It won't be like her usual stage show though. She has to perform in a burka. (NOT!!)

There's some Arabic in her song, "Ojos Así", which is one of her standards. Here's a video of her performing it in Turkey in 2002. Without a burka:



Tags: ,

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Shakira on Capitol Hill - now this is news


She was there advocating for the Global Campaign for Education. This NPR story, Shakira Lobbies Congress on Education for Poor 04/22/08, also has an audio link. See also Shakira brings education campaign to Menendez The Record 04/23/08; Shakira in Washington seeking US aid for universal education AFP 04/22/08; Embajadora de los niños sin educación El Tiempo 21.04.2008; Shakira visitó Congreso de E.U. El Tiempo 23.04.2008; La cantante Shakira promueve la educación infantil con el primer ministro británico El Mundo 23.04.2008.

This link is the site for an MP3 about the campaign, featuring Shakira and some lesser figures, like the British Prime Minister and the President of the World Bank.

Shakira is the chairwoman of Education Action Week, which is organized by the Global Campaign for Education. But her work on behalf of the poor is not a new passion. Thirteen years ago, she started the Barefoot Foundation, which aims to help impoverished Colombian children and those who have been displaced by violence.

"I grew up in a country where unfortunately education is sometimes seen as a luxury, as a privilege, and not as a human right," she says. "This always bothered me. So this is personal to me. In the developing world, people who are born poor will die poor, and that is because of the lack of opportunities, opportunities that come from education. Education can actually save lives."

Shakira says money is needed worldwide to hire qualified teachers; provide children with school meals, textbooks and uniforms; and abolish school fees.
Hey, if Shakira's for it, I'm a supporter, too!

Okay, she also supports the US-Colombia Free Trade Agreement and I'm not so thrilled about that. Not that I wouldn't love to discuss it with her.

Shakira is also an active supporter of la Fundación Alas (América Latina en Acción Solidaria) which aims at raising public consciousness of social problems in Latin America. See Vienen Shakira y Sabina Clarín 16.04.2008.

Tags: ,

Sunday, March 02, 2008

Shakira, "La Despedida"

Here's a Las Vegas version of Shakira singing "La Despedida" without the voice-over interruption included in the video in the previous post.



Tags: ,

Shakira before she was a world star

Bummer news from Latin America: Venezuela and Ecuador are mobilizing their armies for a possible war with Colombia. Correa se une a Chávez y envía sus tropas a la frontera con Colombia El Mundo 03.03.08 Let's hope that doesn't happen.

But this post is about a happier subject, Colombia's greatest export, Shakira Isabel Mebarak Ripoll, better known as just Shakira.

This YouTube video is a segment from 20/20 that talks about her background and her early years in show business. The interviewer isn't exactly asking tough questions. But when do they ever on an entertainment segment? But that's fine because Shakira can be more substantive than many of our political pundits can manage, even without probing questions. There's even a "comeback" story involved!



This one was featured on AOL Latino today as one of a series of videos of famous singers before they got famous. She must be all of about 14 years old in this clip. But you can hear the power of her voice even then, although some of the high notes don't entirely hold together. The song is called "Sera el angel::



This is a clip of a very grown-up Shakira in torch singer mode doing a song called, "
Amor (Celos De Ti)".



And the following two videos features songs by Shakira from the Love in the Time of Colera sound track. The first one, "Hay Amores", is from a performance in Las Vegas. The second, "La Despedida", really just has the song with a picture of the album cover. But that's okay. I only like her for her music anyway.





Tags: ,